Reasonable Inferences from Quantum Mechanics: A Response to "Quantum Misuse in Psychic Literature"

One of 937 articles in Journal of Near-Death Studies
2019-21 2019-21
Thumbnail image of item number 1 in: 'Reasonable Inferences from Quantum Mechanics: A Response to "Quantum Misuse in Psychic Literature"'.
Thumbnail image of item number 2 in: 'Reasonable Inferences from Quantum Mechanics: A Response to "Quantum Misuse in Psychic Literature"'.
Thumbnail image of item number 3 in: 'Reasonable Inferences from Quantum Mechanics: A Response to "Quantum Misuse in Psychic Literature"'.
Thumbnail image of item number 4 in: 'Reasonable Inferences from Quantum Mechanics: A Response to "Quantum Misuse in Psychic Literature"'.
Showing 1-4 of 16 pages in this article.

PDF Version Also Available for Download.

Description

Abstract: This invited article is a response to the paper "Quantum Misuse in Psychic Literature," by Jack A. Mroczkowski and Alexis P. Malozemoff, published in this issue of the Journal of Near-Death Studies. Whereas I sympathize with Mroczkowski's and Malozemoff's cause and goals, and I recognize the problem that they attempted to tackle, I argue that their criticisms often overshot the mark and end up adding to the confusion. I address nince specific technical points that Mroczkowski and Malozemoff accused popular writers in the fields of health care and parapsychology of misunderstanding and misrepresenting. I argue that, by and large--and … continued below

Physical Description

[16] p.

Creation Information

Kastrup, Bernardo Spring 2019.

Context

This article is part of the collection entitled: Journal of Near-Death Studies and was provided by the UNT Libraries to the UNT Digital Library, a digital repository hosted by the UNT Libraries. It has been viewed 181 times. More information about this article can be viewed below.

Who

People and organizations associated with either the creation of this article or its content.

Author

Publisher

Provided By

UNT Libraries

The UNT Libraries serve the university and community by providing access to physical and online collections, fostering information literacy, supporting academic research, and much, much more.

About | Browse this Partner

Contact Us

Corrections Questions

What

Descriptive information to help identify this article. Follow the links below to find similar items on the Digital Library.

Titles

Description

Abstract: This invited article is a response to the paper "Quantum Misuse in Psychic Literature," by Jack A. Mroczkowski and Alexis P. Malozemoff, published in this issue of the Journal of Near-Death Studies. Whereas I sympathize with Mroczkowski's and Malozemoff's cause and goals, and I recognize the problem that they attempted to tackle, I argue that their criticisms often overshot the mark and end up adding to the confusion. I address nince specific technical points that Mroczkowski and Malozemoff accused popular writers in the fields of health care and parapsychology of misunderstanding and misrepresenting. I argue that, by and large--and contrary to Mroczkowski's and Malozemoff's claims--the statements made by these writers are often reasonable and generally consistent with the current state of play in foundations of quantum mechanics.

Physical Description

[16] p.

Notes

"[The Journal of Near-Death Studies] is the only peer-reviewed scholarly journal (ISSN 0891-4494) devoted exclusively to the field of near-death studies. It is cross-disciplinary and published quarterly."

Pagination is continuous through volumes.

Source

  • Journal of Near-Death Studies, 37(3), International Association for Near-Death Studies, Spring 2019, pp. #

Language

Item Type

Identifier

Unique identifying numbers for this article in the Digital Library or other systems.

Publication Information

  • Publication Title: Journal of Near-Death Studies
  • Volume: 37
  • Issue: 3
  • Page Start: 185
  • Page End: 200

Relationships

Collections

This article is part of the following collection of related materials.

Journal of Near-Death Studies

The Journal of Near-Death Studies is a scholarly peer-reviewed journal devoted to the field of near-death studies. It is published on a quarterly basis by the International Association for Near-Death Studies. The Journal began publication in 1982 under the name Anabiosis which was changed to its current title in 1986 with the start of Volume 6.

About | Browse this Collection

Related Items

Quantum Misuse in Psychic Literature (Article)

Quantum Misuse in Psychic Literature

Abstract: In this paper, we address an unfortunate growing trend involving misuse of quantum physics in psychic and healing literature, including literature on near-death experiences. After a brief introduction to quantum physics, we provide examples and explanations of misuse. Such misuse encourages undue skepticism of what might otherwise be valuable reading. We conclude with recommendations to authors and publishers about how to guard against this problem.

Relationship to this item: (References)

Quantum Misuse in Psychic Literature, ark:/67531/metadc1752582

Quantum Misuse in Psychic Literature: A Rejoinder (Article)

Quantum Misuse in Psychic Literature: A Rejoinder

Abstract: We provide a rejoinder to the responses of Chopra, Goswami, Kastrup, Radin, and van Lommel to our article "Quantum Misuse in Psychic Literature" that opens this journal issue. Our comments may be summarized in two main themes: These authors failed to recognize (a) how and why the von Neumann concept that only consciousness can collapse the quantum wavefunction has been largely rejected by physicists today and that quantum collapse is now understood to be able to occur without a conscious human observer, and (b) that their efforts to justify a universal consciousness on the basis of presently understood nonlocality are flawed. Also, in our view, from a quantum physics perspective the universe may be much less entangled and holistic than psi authors often assume. In conclusion, we contend that quantum misuse by psi authors remains a serious problem, undermining the credibility of psi research. We provide suggestions to help psi authors avoid this problem in the future.

Relationship to this item: (Is Referenced By)

Quantum Misuse in Psychic Literature: A Rejoinder, ark:/67531/metadc1752581

What responsibilities do I have when using this article?

Digital Files

When

Dates and time periods associated with this article.

Creation Date

  • Spring 2019

Added to The UNT Digital Library

  • Jan. 27, 2021, 4:25 p.m.

Description Last Updated

  • Feb. 10, 2022, 4:31 p.m.

Usage Statistics

When was this article last used?

Yesterday: 0
Past 30 days: 0
Total Uses: 181
More Statistics

Interact With This Article

Here are some suggestions for what to do next.

Start Reading

Thumbnail image of item number 1 in: 'Reasonable Inferences from Quantum Mechanics: A Response to "Quantum Misuse in Psychic Literature"'.
Thumbnail image of item number 2 in: 'Reasonable Inferences from Quantum Mechanics: A Response to "Quantum Misuse in Psychic Literature"'.
Thumbnail image of item number 3 in: 'Reasonable Inferences from Quantum Mechanics: A Response to "Quantum Misuse in Psychic Literature"'.
Thumbnail image of item number 4 in: 'Reasonable Inferences from Quantum Mechanics: A Response to "Quantum Misuse in Psychic Literature"'.

PDF Version Also Available for Download.

Citations, Rights, Re-Use

International Image Interoperability Framework

IIF Logo

We support the IIIF Presentation API

Links for Robots

Helpful links in machine-readable formats.

Archival Resource Key (ARK)

International Image Interoperability Framework (IIIF)

Metadata Formats

Images

URLs

Stats

Kastrup, Bernardo. Reasonable Inferences from Quantum Mechanics: A Response to "Quantum Misuse in Psychic Literature", article, Spring 2019; Durham, North Carolina. (https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1752580/: accessed May 24, 2024), University of North Texas Libraries, UNT Digital Library, https://digital.library.unt.edu; .

Back to Top of Screen